Wednesday, May 2, 2012

How Can Colloidal Silver Be Tested for Silver Content?

Can demonstrating the content of a colloidal silver solution help convince skeptical family members or friends that colloidal silver is safe and effective? 

Probably not.  It’s generally not the content of the silver solution they’re skeptical of, but instead, the safety and effectiveness.

Nevertheless, here are some ways to test your colloidal silver solutions.  And some even better ways to help convince skeptical friends or family members of the powerful healing, infection-fighting and immune-boosting qualities of colloidal silver…

Hi, Steve Barwick here, for www.TheSilverEdge.com...

A member of the Colloidal Silver Secrets Community on Facebook recently posted the following question and comment: 

How can colloidal silver be tested for content?  Like all other substance that don’t come from a pharmacy by way of a doctor, usage of colloidal silver is a topic that brings up many questions, looks, smirks, smiles, laughs, etc. I have used it for specific problems and have no complaints whatsoever!

My answer:  That's kind of like asking "How can my Vitamin C be tested for content?" or "How can my fish oil be tested for content?"

If a person is already biased against using natural substances, and prefers prescriptions drugs from a doctor, no amount of content testing of a natural substance like colloidal silver, vitamin C or fish oil is going to convince them otherwise.

Of course, testing the content of any natural product -- including colloidal silver -- can be indeed done. But it requires an experienced and licensed testing laboratory, and of course, plenty of money.  (But I’ll reveal a simple home test you can do yourself, below…)

Atomic Absorption Analysis and TEM Testing

The gold standard laboratory test for determining the concentration (i.e., ppm) of a batch of colloidal silver is a test called Atomic Absorption Analysis Mass Flame Spectrometry (AAAMFS).

This is about a $500-plus laboratory test conducted on a $50,000 to $100,000-plus piece of lab equipment.

Another lab test, Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), can also be used to measure the size of the silver particles, and get a good visual idea of the concentration of silver particles in the solution.

TEM is a $2,000 - $4,000 laboratory test (depending upon number of samples submitted), conducted on a multi-million dollar microscope capable of magnifications up to 175,000x. 

This astonishing level of magnification allows you to visually see – and photograph -- the tiny, sub-microscopic silver particles in a colloidal silver solution.

For example, at this link you can see a photo-reproduction of a TEM slide demonstrating the tiny, sub-nanometer size of the silver particles produced by the Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator from The Silver Edge.

This TEM slide shows the astonishing concentration of sub-nanometer sized silver particles in just THREE DROPS from a micro-particle colloidal silver solution.

Atomic Absorption Analysis Mass Flame Spectrometry (AAAMFS) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) are the two main laboratory testing procedures most major colloidal silver vendors use to determine the concentration (i.e., ppm) and particle size of the colloidal silver products they manufacture.  There are other equally sophisticated pieces of lab equipment that can be used for testing colloidal silver, but those are the two main ones, and the results are considered so accurate they are accepted in a court of law.

TDS Meters, PPM and Colloidal Silver Quality

A lot of people who make their own colloidal silver try to use those little $49 TDS (Total Dissolved Solids) meters to measure the “ppm” or concentration of their colloidal silver batches.

Generally, they’re operating under the mistaken impression that the “ppm” of a colloidal silver solution determines its quality. Quite the contrary, all the “ppm” tells you is the total weight of silver (i.e., concentration) in a given solution.

As explained in my article "Why Higher PPM Is Not Always Better," you can have a colloidal silver solution with 500 ppm, and another with 20 ppm, and the 20 ppm solution could easily outperform the supposedly stronger 500 ppm solution.

That's because stronger concentrations of colloidal silver (i.e., ppm) almost always contain excessively large silver particles which the body treats as if you'd eaten dirt, i.e., it goes in one end and is expelled out the other without being taken into the cells, tissues and organs where the pathogens like to hide and colonize.

So you can't base quality of a colloidal silver solution solely on the "ppm" or concentration of a batch of colloidal silver. Quality is almost always associated more strongly with particle size -- the smaller the silver particles, the easier it is for the body to assimilate and utilize them, sending them throughout the body into the cells, tissues and organs where they can get at the colonies of pathogens.

This is why, when you were young, your parents probably reminded you frequently to "chew your food" when you were eating. The entire reason we have teeth is so we can grind the nutrients out of the food we're eating, making these nutrients far more accessible to the body once they enter the digestive tract, and easier for the body to capture, assimilate and utilize, i.e., sending them into the cells, tissues and organs where they do the most good.

But un-chewed food provides very little nutrition to the body. The tiny nutrients are not released from un-chewed food, and it pretty much goes in one end and out the other. Therefore those who make it a point to thoroughly chew their food before swallowing it typically get far more life-giving nutrition into their body than those who don’t. 

This is the same with colloidal silver: Ingesting solutions composed of overly large silver particles will tend to go in one end and out the other, while solutions composed of ultra-small silver particles (i.e., micro-particle silver, or as it's now called, "nanoparticle" silver) are accepted by the body as "nutrition," and carried throughout the body into the cells, tissues and organs where needed.

Thus, the particle size, far more than “ppm,” is what makes for an effective, high-quality colloidal silver solution. 

This is why TheSilverEdge.com, distributors of the Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator, places far more emphasis on the particle size of a batch of colloidal silver than on the ppm. 

And it’s why you should always do business with a company willing to post the results of their independent lab testing on their web site.  This is true whether you’re looking to purchase a colloidal silver generator to make your own colloidal silver, or whether you prefer to buy commercial brands of colloidal silver.

While ppm is a good thing to know, the particle size is far more important in terms of the ability of a colloidal silver solution to produce healing results in the human body. 

Why TDS Meters Fall Short

That brings me back to TDS meters.  TDS stands for “total dissolved solids.”

These little devices work fairly well if you’re trying to measure the levels of typical mineral substances found in tap water, aquarium water, a hydroponics system, a swimming pool, or even a pond or lake.  
Unfortunately, TDS meters are notoriously inaccurate for measuring the concentration of silver in a colloidal silver solution. 

The main problem with TDS meters is that they're specifically designed and calibrated to measure the ppm (concentration) of dissolved solids such as sodium, potassium, phosphate, nitrate, alkaline, calcium, sulfur and others. 

These are mineral substances that dissolve upon exposure to liquid.  And typically they can be found in concentrations of many hundreds of ppm in water sources such as ponds, lakes, streams, hydroponic gardens, aquariums, home tap water etc

But colloidal silver is not a dissolved solid.  Indeed, whether in the ionic form or the metallic form, it’s a suspended particulate.  That’s quite another animal altogether, with decidedly different qualities than a dissolved solid. 

Simply put, unlike dissolved solids such as salt, calcium etc., silver doesn’t dissolve in water.  So trying to use a Total Dissolved Solids (i.e., TDS) meter to read a colloidal silver solution consisting of suspended particulates of silver puts you at a decided disadvantage right from the get-go.

What’s more, TDS meters are generally calibrated using a calibration solution that’s composed of anywhere from 300 ppm to 1,000 ppm (or even higher) of dissolved salt.  Yet concentrations of typical colloidal silver solutions are usually in the range of 10-20 ppm, and again, are composed chiefly of suspended particulates rather than dissolved solids such as salts. 

It gets even worse when you come to realize that only about 90% of the suspended silver particles in a typical colloidal silver solution produce sufficient electrical potential to register strongly on a TDS meter.  And of the 90% that can be measured, the electrical potential is less than HALF the electrical potential of the salt solution used to calibrate the TDS meter in the first place. 

So the more you examine the situation, the more the potential for significant inaccuracy continues to pile up.  Indeed, all of this taken together can produce a minimum of a 50% or greater deviation in accuracy when using a TDS meter to measure the “ppm” of a typical colloidal silver solution. 

In short, trying to use a TDS meter to measure a 10-20 ppm colloidal silver solution is like trying to measure the weight of a sewing needle with a bathroom scale.  You might get a reading.  But it’s unlikely to be the right one.  It’s simply not designed to do the job.  It’s just not the right tool.  

(As an aside, one colloidal silver generator manufacturer even has a video on his web site showing the calibration solution he supplies with the TDS meters he sells. It states right on the label that it’s a 1,382 ppm saline calibration solution. Yet he openly admits his generator produces only a 10-20 ppm colloidal silver solution. Do you see the problem here with the readings that will be produced by a TDS meter calibrated to a 1,382 ppm solution of dissolved salt?)

In actual matter of fact, no TDS meter was ever designed to measure a colloidal silver solution. And not one reputable manufacturer of TDS meters sell, market or advertise their product as being able to measure colloidal silver. 

Only unscrupulous colloidal silver vendors and self-appointed YouTube colloidal silver “gurus” on the internet (who sell these little TDS meters for $49 to $69 a pop, usually after buying them in bulk from Thailand for $7 to $10 apiece) claim they’re accurate for measuring colloidal silver. 

The bottom line is that a TDS meter is specifically designed to measure the level of total dissolved solids in a liquid solution by reacting to the electrolytic conductivity in the solution created by the dissolved solids.  The more dissolved solids in the water, the more electrolytic conductivity can be measured. 

But colloidal silver, correctly made, should have as close to zero total dissolved solids in the water as possible.  After all, you start with steam-distilled water, which should contain anywhere from zero (best case scenario) to no more than 1 ppm dissolved solids.

And the only thing added during the colloidal silver-making process is suspended silver particulates such as silver ions, silver oxide or metallic silver. No dissolved solids. 

So a typical colloidal silver solution should, at the very most, contain 1 ppm total dissolved solids, preferably even less.  And the remaining 99% (or more) of the colloidal silver solution should be composed of suspended silver particulates.  Yet the YouTube colloidal silver “gurus” continue to sell total dissolved solids meters to measure colloidal silver solutions composed of 99% suspended particulates of silver.

Unbelievable, I know.  But it’s true.

Finally, if you understand the fact that “ppm” is actually a measurement of the weight of a substance (such as silver) in a liquid solution (see this link for an eye-opening explanation of ppm), you can easily see another reason why TDS meters can be so inaccurate – they don’t weigh anything. 

So a TDS meter produces what can only be described at best as a very crude estimate of the ppm of a batch of colloidal silver. 

Even the tech gurus at Hanna -- the most respected manufacturer of TDS meters in the world -- will tell you their units are not designed for accurately measuring the concentration of colloidal silver in a solution.

You simply can't expect the kind of accuracy out of a $49 or $69 hand-held device that you'll get out of a multi-million dollar piece of laboratory equipment like a Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM) or a $50,000 to $100,000 piece of lab equipment like an Atomic Absorption Analysis Mass Flame Spectrometer (AAMFS).

Indeed, if TDS meters were so accurate, why do laboratories invest hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars on high-tech measurement equipment like AAMFS when instead they could spend $49 to $69 on one of these little meters and throw one helluva party in Las Vegas with the rest of the money?

The question pretty much answers itself.  The meters are clumsy “toys” compared to high-tech laboratory measurement equipment.  

Disclosure: 

Although I won’t sell TDS meters through my company due to the fact I think it’s deceptive to promote them as “accurate” for measuring colloidal silver solutions, I do nevertheless own three of them. 

I occasionally use my TDS meters to check the ppm of my steam-distilled water to make sure it’s 1 ppm or less total dissolved solids, because I know that makes the best quality colloidal silver. 

And sometimes I compare the readings of one batch of colloidal silver against another batch if I’ve run the batches for different lengths of time. But I know that’s just for comparison’s sake, and not an accurate measurement of the actual ppm.  

If it makes you feel better to have one of these little devices  simply understand in advance that they can be up to 50% or more inaccurate, and that at best you’re getting only a crude estimate of the actual silver content in your colloidal silver batches.  It’s better to deal with a company that shares their independent laboratory testing, so you know what you’re getting. 

TDS meters can inexpensively be purchased at many online resources.  So don’t pay $69 or $79 to some “guru” (who’s getting them from Thailand for $7 or $10 apiece), when you can find them with a simple Google search for half that price, or sometimes even less. 

Simple Laser Light Test

Finally, if you simply want to make sure there are silver particles in your solution after you’ve made a batch of colloidal silver, you can perform a simple home laser light test.

While this test won’t give you a measurement of the ppm, or concentration, it allows you to see visually that there are indeed billions of tiny silver particles suspended in your colloidal silver solution.
In other words, it allows you to answer the oft-asked question, “How do I know there are any silver particles in this solution?”

To do this test, you'll need one of those little red laser pointer lights, available through online sources for under $20 (or at your local Wal-Mart for under $5). Here's how it works:

If you pour about four or five ounces of colloidal silver into a clear drinking glass, and then go into a dark closet and shine a red laser pointer light down (from the top) into the solution (don't shine it into your eyes), you'll be able to see a thin read beam of red light shining through the solution.

That's because the red laser light reflects off of the tiny silver particles in the solution. This is your evidence that you actually have billions of tiny microscopic silver particles suspended by their electrical charge in the solution.

Were you to do the same thing with plain old distilled water, you'd see no red light shining through the water whatsoever, because there is no mineral content in the plain distilled water for the red laser light to reflect off of.

When shining a red laser light into your colloidal silver solution, the light shining through the solution will be very bright if the silver particles are particularly large. That's because they have a larger reflective surface, and therefore reflect more of the red laser light.

But if the silver particles are particularly small, you'll see a thinner, much more faint red light shining through the solution. That's because the smaller silver particles have less reflective surface.

Either way, you can shine the red laser light all through the solution, and the red beam you'll see demonstrates the fact that the solution is literally teeming with billions upon billions of tiny silver particles suspended in the solution by their electrical charge.

If you look closely at the red beam in the solution (again, never shine it into your eyes, as this can cause injury or blindness), you might even see what appears to be movement of the tiny silver particles through the thin beam of red light, as if the silver particles were “dancing” in and out of the red beam.  You might even see occasional tiny “flashes” in the red laser beam light.

Here’s what’s happening:

Thanks to the positive electrical charge on each silver particle in the solution, these silver particles are in a constant state of motion referred to in science as Brownian motion

Similar to the way a magnet will repel another magnet if you attempt to touch their like polls together (i.e., positive to positive, or negative to negative), the positive electrical charge on these billions and billions of silver particles in a colloidal silver solution also cause them to repel one another sharply as they come into close proximity with each other. 

This keeps all of the silver particles in the solution constantly moving, as if every human being on the planet were to suddenly start dancing with each other – no one touching each other, but nevertheless creating a bustling “hive” (so to speak) of non-stop activity everywhere you look.

Only in the case of a colloidal silver solution, it’s electro-magnetically propelled activity.

What you are seeing in the red laser light, if you look closely enough are hundreds of thousands or even millions of sub-microscopic silver particles separated from each other by their positive electrical charge, appearing to “dance” or even “flash” through the red laser beam.   

Convincing Skeptical Friends and Family Members

So, testing a colloidal silver solution for content can easily be done. But convincing skeptical friends, family members etc., that this actually means anything to them is the hard part.

You need something more than just hard data.  In that light, you might enjoy my article from earlier this year, titled "Trials and Tribulations of Telling Friends and Family Members About Colloidal Silver." If you’ve ever had a friend or family member give you that smirk usually reserved for crazy uncles after you’ve tried to tell them about colloidal silver, you’ll relate totally to this article.

You might also find that referring skeptical friends and family members to the Colloidal Silver Success Stories web site is a far more effective way of helping educate them and allay their skepticism toward colloidal silver. 

On this web site, literally dozens of experienced colloidal silver users have written in with their personal experiences in using colloidal silver for an astonishingly wide range of health issues. 

Oft times, the easiest way to convince skeptics is to let them see for themselves what multitudes of other people outside of their close circle of family members and friends have to say. 

Another way to help allay the skepticism so frequently encountered when telling people about the infection-fighting and immune-boosting properties of colloidal silver is to refer them to the “What Experts Say About Colloidal Silver” page of TheSilverEdge.com web site. 

This web page has hundreds and hundreds of quotes on colloidal silver usage, safety, efficacy and much more, from modern-day health and medical experts, as well as quotes from the experts going back all of the way to the late 1800’s. 

Again, when even the most hardened skeptic gets to see for himself that colloidal silver has been used successfully in health and medicine for over 110 years, this can be very convincing evidence.

Finally, the “Clinical Studies and Reports on Colloidal Silver” page on TheSilverEdge.com web site is also a treasure trove of solid clinical evidence demonstrating the safety and effectiveness of colloidal silver.

This web page contains over four dozen clinical medical studies and “white paper” reports on colloidal silver’s effectiveness, many from major medical universities and clinical research facilities.  (And I continue to add new studies to this page as they come out.) 

Being able to show your skeptical friends and family members the actual clinical studies demonstrating the effectiveness of colloidal silver often proves to be extremely helpful in convincing them to at least give colloidal silver a fair shake before dismissing or denigrating it.

The Best Test of All

The best test of all for colloidal silver, of course, is using it

No matter how a particular colloidal silver product can be defined from a laboratory perspective, it is only truly "good" if it effectively supports or enhances the body's ability to kill infections, without causing harm to the body itself.

Short of that, it is a relatively worthless product no matter how many self-serving laboratory parameters it is claimed to fit.

With "good" colloidal silver properly defined as that which really works when you use it, the only thing left for the consumer to decide is whether to make "good" colloidal silver at home for pennies per quart with a high-quality home colloidal silver generator, or to purchase "good" colloidal silver from commercial vendors at prices ranging from 500 to 1,000 times the cost of making your own.

With a high-quality Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator from The Silver Edge, you can make a full quart (32 ounces) of high-quality micro-particle colloidal silver for about thirty six cents.

 Or, you can pay a commercial vendor up to $29 or more for a tiny four-ounce bottle of colloidal silver.

Let common-sense be your guide. And until the next issue, I remain…

Yours for the safe, sane and responsible use of colloidal silver,


Helpful Links:

                                                                                                                                                 
Important Note and Disclaimer:  The contents of this Ezine have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.  Information conveyed herein is from sources deemed to be accurate and reliable, but no guarantee can be made in regards to the accuracy and reliability thereof.  The author, Steve Barwick, is a natural health journalist with over 30 years of experience writing professionally about natural health topics.  He is not a doctor.  Therefore, nothing stated in this Ezine should be construed as prescriptive in nature, nor is any part of this Ezine meant to be considered a substitute for professional medical advice.  Nothing reported herein is intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.  The author is simply reporting in journalistic fashion what he has learned during the past 17 years of journalistic research into colloidal silver and its usage.  Therefore, the information and data presented should be considered for informational purposes only, and approached with caution.  Readers should verify for themselves, and to their own satisfaction, from other knowledgeable sources such as their doctor, the accuracy and reliability of all reports, ideas, conclusions, comments and opinions stated herein.  All important health care decisions should be made under the guidance and direction of a legitimate, knowledgeable and experienced health care professional.  Readers are solely responsible for their choices.  The author and publisher disclaim responsibility or liability for any loss or hardship that may be incurred as a result of the use or application of any information included in this Ezine.

Monday, April 30, 2012

The L.A. Times Bashes Colloidal Silver, But People Are Tearing Off the Blinders!

Here’s another great example of how the media propaganda machine works to deceive the public into believing colloidal silver is “unsafe and ineffective.” 

In this case, the LA Times has published a series of articles repeating the mantra that colloidal silver is “not FDA approved”…has “serious side effects”…and “doesn’t work,” to boot! 

But is this blatant media propaganda working?  Or are people finally waking up to the many ways Big Pharma and its lackeys use the mainstream media to pull the wool over their eyes?

Hi, Steve Barwick here, for www.TheSilverEdge.com...

People continue to send me copies of the L.A. Times series of articles blasting colloidal silver usage.

This article, for example, actually came out back in 2009.  But it’s still causing a stir, to this very day, especially among those who are a bit newer to colloidal silver usage, and who might come across the article inadvertently when doing research on the internet.

The article is obviously heavily biased against colloidal silver usage.  And the author, Tami Dennis, the Times Health & Science editor, openly admits she “takes the word ‘skeptic’ to previously uncharted territory.”

Well, she may be a super-skeptic about colloidal silver and other natural health products.  And that’s her right.  But as a practicing journalist, she should at least attempt to get the facts straight when she writes about a topic. 

Unfortunately, she’s not a very good researcher or writer either, for that matter.  And like most so-called “skeptics,” she’s more of a clumsy propagandist than a journalist.

Toeing the (Bureaucratic) Line

Indeed, she cites only the official bureaucratic bric-a-brac that backs up her contentions.  And she cites no research whatsoever from real colloidal silver experts.  What’s more, much of the material she cites is decidedly misleading. 

For example, she directs her readers to online material that says “colloidal silver is not approved as safe or effective by the FDA.”

Well, la-di-da.  What she doesn’t reveal, of course, is that the only reason colloidal silver is “not approved as safe or effective by the FDA” is that the FDA only approves pharmaceutical drugs.  And colloidal silver is not a drug, it’s a simple mineral nutritional supplement.

Indeed, there are absolutely zero “FDA-approved” nutritional supplements.  Not even one on the face of the earth.  Supplements are either allowed to be sold by the FDA.  Or disallowed.  But they are never “approved” by the FDA.

In fact, if you try to claim that a nutritional supplement is “FDA approved,” the FDA will come down on you like flies on stink. 

So this particular accusation against colloidal silver one of the most disingenuous charges ever – a feeble ploy to make people think colloidal silver is a singularly rogue element lacking the FDA’s benevolent imprimatur. 

In reality, the FDA has never “approved” a single nutritional supplement.  Not ever. 

And as we’ve seen from the over 200,000 deaths caused each and every year by Big Pharma’s FDA-approved drugs, FDA approval does not necessarily equate with safety or effectiveness. In many cases, it just means someone had enough money to pay the right people. 

Ignoring the Scientific Evidence
While Claiming It Doesn’t Exist…

Ms. Dennis goes on to direct her readers to another web site claiming there’s “no scientific evidence” for colloidal silver’s effectiveness.  

What she fails to reveal, of course, is that hundreds of thousands of oral doses of colloidal silver are administered every month – in both clinical and non-clinical settings – often with astonishing healing results.  And this is widely known by cutting edge doctors and clinical researchers here in the U.S. and around the world.

As Dr. Kent Holtorf, M.D., of the Holtorf Medical Group states in his White Paper, "Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Oligodynamic Silver":

"Hundreds of thousands of doses of oral colloidal silver and thousands of doses of intravenous colloidal silver are given every month in the United States.

This is usually done to treat acute and chronic infections including those associated with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) and fibromyalgia (FM).

The effectiveness of the use of oral and intravenous colloidal silver in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia was presented at the 38th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine…

…(Identifying the Causes and Exploring the Newest Treatment Options for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia and Environmental Sensitivities) in October 2003…

The extremely low level of colloidal silver used at 23 parts per million (ppm) has been shown to have little or no potential for toxicity while having the significant potential for clinical benefit.

The effectiveness of oligodynamic silver’s antimicrobial action at extremely low doses in combination with its potential immune stimulating actions, makes oligodynamic silver an ideal naturally occurring substance in the treatment of CFS and FM."

What’s more, numerous science, medical and clinical research experts strongly recommend colloidal silver usage and vouch for its effectiveness.

You can read quotes from many of these bona-fide medical experts in my recent article titled “What REAL Medical, Scientific and Clinical Research Experts Have to Say About Colloidal Silver Usage.”

Indeed, were colloidal silver a regulated drug rather than a simple mineral supplement, the preponderance of clinical evidence regarding its effectiveness against infections and disease would be so overwhelming the bureaucrats at the FDA would have little choice but to approve it. 

As I’ve reported in the past, researchers in Europe are even working to turn silver into a pharmaceutical drug by engineering it to be combined with other substances, including dead bacteria, so it can be patented as a “novel treatment” for internal infections.  And they swear their freakish franken-silver drug kills everything from serious cases of food poisoning to cold and flu viruses. 

But of course, safe, natural colloidal silver itself is deemed to be “ineffective” by the medical bureaucrats simply because…drum roll, please…they say so. 

Serious Side Effects? 

Finally, Ms. Dennis directs her readers to information containing the biggest scare tactic of them all, i.e., that colloidal silver users have “severe risk for serious side effects.” 

What she fails to reveal, of course, is that an estimated ten million people across North America and Mexico, and millions more throughout Europe, have been using colloidal silver for decades without suffering from any of these “serious side effects.” 

What’s more, throughout Europe colloidal silver is routinely used on cruise ships and cargo ships as a water disinfectant. 

It’s also been used on the space shuttle.  And it’s been used in both NASA and Russian manned space flights.    

And colloidal silver has also been used around the world to purify municipal drinking water. 

And it’s been a daily mainstay for millions of people in Mexico, Costa Rica and other developing nations throughout South America who use it as a matter of course to disinfect their drinking water supplies.  

So where are all of the people suffering from these “serious side effects” from colloidal silver?  Where are all of the Mexicans, Costa Ricans and South Americans who use colloidal silver regularly to disinfect their water? All of the cargo ship workers?  European cruise ship vacationers? Space Station astronauts? 

Surely out of the estimated 10 million regular colloidal silver users throughout North America, we’d have tens of thousands of people reporting these “serious side effects” by now, right?

Ahem…actually, they’re nowhere to be seen. 

Indeed, as I’ve explained repeatedly in online articles (see here, and here) it’s only when people take excessively large quantities or excessively high concentrations of colloidal silver for months or years on end, against all constraints of reason and common sense, that side effects take place. 

And even then, according to the EPA the most common side effect – argria, or skin-staining -- is strictly cosmetic, rather than toxic. 

(Get a FREE copy of the Colloidal Silver Safe Dosage Report, and learn how to calculate your maximum daily dosage rate based on your weight and the ppm of the colloidal silver you’re using.)

Meanwhile, let me re-state that over 210,000 Americans flat-out DIE each year from use of Big Pharma’s prescription drugs, and the vast majority of them were using the drugs properly!

Where are all Ms. Dennis’ screaming, hyperventilating articles slamming Big Pharma and its decidedly deadly pharmaceutical drugs? 

Where’s the L.A. Times lamenting the dangers of prescription drugs and warning the public against them? 

Oooh.  Once again, nowhere to be seen. 

Apparently, a self-avowed “skeptic” like Ms. Dennis is only allowed to be skeptical of safe, natural products, not pharmaceutical drugs. 

Interestingly, according to the Poison Control Center, no one has ever died from colloidal silver usage, or for that matter, from usage of any other mineral supplement, vitamin, herb or amino acid in over 27 years.

So much the journalistic credibility of Ms. Dennis and the L.A. Times.

People Are Catching On,
And the Blinders Are Coming Off!

One thing I thoroughly enjoyed was reading the numerous comments from Ms. Dennis’ readers in the Comments section that follows her smug, anti-colloidal silver tirade. 

It seems that her readers are a heckuva lot smarter than she is. 

For the most part, these comments showed that people are thinking for themselves, and not just accepting the shrill squeals of the propagandists as “fact.”

For example, this comment on Ms. Dennis’ article hits the nail on the head:

“This story is stupid.....ANYTHING in large doses is harmful, period!

Watch daytime TV commercials...they’re full of FDA drug recalls and lawsuits...wake up people.”

Or this one…

“If the FDA is cracking down on it then you can be pretty certain that it’s an effective and safe alternative to the toxic drugs the pharmaceutical companies are pumping into us.

Pharmaceutical drugs are one of the biggest killers on the western world, and yet they say colloidal silver is dangerous because it turned one man blue?”

Or this one…

“The FDA has manipulated and hijacked the critical thinking skills of an entire country...I cannot tell you the number of problems colloidal silver has solved in my life.

My college age son returned this summer with a deep, barking, bronchial cough he said he had for a month. 2 days of colloidal silver and it was almost gone. 4 days and it was history.

It has stopped gum infections.  It has also helped a traveler's stomach.”

Or this one…

Another attack on something that actually works. The FDA and its cronies, on behalf of the pharmaceutical companies (which make money selling toxic drugs) and the medical establishment, continue attacking our rights to use natural substances.
The real problem is that silver works TOO well, and it’s growing popularity threatens drug sales and the notion that anything other than so-called ‘miracles’ of modern medicine work…

This type of story is a total red flag that should not be ignored, but instead should lead to calls supporting consumers' rights to health freedom.”

Or this one…

“How sad to see such blatant and pathetic evidence that our major news carriers are so obviously under the thumb of our pharmaceutical propaganda machine. Sad but so true.”

Or this one…

“This is total big pharma owning the mainstream media.  Even that photo of the silver hydrosol above is meant to mislead. Silver is a clear liquid like water and doesn't look like that poison above.”

Or this one…

“Wow, what a pathetic article. Colloidal silver works GREAT as an antifungal, antibacterial, and antiviral.

There is PLENTY of research in the past and it was used for centuries prior to the patentable pharmaceutical substances now used in contemporary society.

People, don't listen to the idiots that write articles like this. Do your own research and take it from people who make and use properly prepared colloidal silver - it really works!  Seriously!”

Or this one…

“I was shocked at the imbalance of this article and at the prejudice expressed through disintegrated grammar and poorly expressed ideas.

It's the LA Times, for goodness sakes. Where are your journalistic principles? Where is your impartiality? Whose pocket are you in, exactly?

This report is a disgrace on many levels.”

Online Carpet Bombing

But for me, perhaps the most telling comment under Ms. Dennis’ article was this one:  "Funny how 10 news websites are saying bad things about colloidal silver all on the same day!" 

That commentator hit the nail on the head. 

Indeed, that's how the so-called "skeptics," “quackbusters,” natural health “debunkers” often work.  They coordinate attacks on a colloidal silver (or other nutritional supplements) across multiple web sites all during the same time-period, in an attempt to give the public the impression that EVERYBODY is suddenly warning against the supposed “dangers” of the substance.  

It’s the online version of carpet bombing.  And of course, it’s very effective.  Indeed, we've seen this time and time again. 

For example, when articles on the sensationalistic and deceptive "dermal toxicity" study on nanosilver came out last year, portraying nanosilver in commercial products as being so toxic to the skin it might cause cancer, the information was suddenly being spread across multiple web sites around the world almost overnight.

This, in spite of the fact that the study itself had nothing to do with cancer.  What’s more, it was conducted on tiny albino guinea pigs and not humans.  

Finally, the concentration of nanosilver used on the poor little guinea pigs each day for weeks on end was 10,000 ppm, which of course is many thousands of times higher than anyone would ever come into contact with from a commercial product that contains nanosilver.

Yet the articles on this study miraculously reached the tops of the Google search engine results in just a few days, even though the study itself was from an obscure source in Iran. 

If you’re interested, you can read my expose of this study, "How Junk Science Propaganda Against Colloidal Silver Gets Started” which demonstrates exactly how the propaganda game against colloidal silver and all forms of antimicrobial silver works.  

Similarly, when Israeli researchers invented silver-impregnated butcher paper last year in an attempt to help stop the growing spread of bacterial contamination on meat products…

I immediately predicted the radical anti-silver crowd would throw everything they had at this highly beneficial invention in order to stop it dead in its tracks. 

And of course, they did exactly that, conducting an online drive-by shooting campaign against the invention, unlike any I've ever witnessed.

In fact, they quickly dubbed the silver-impregnated butcher paper as "killer paper," and began spreading negative articles about it all over the internet in a matter of days through their worldwide network of web sites. 

You can read how they used abject propaganda to destroy the great idea behind this potentially life-saving invention almost overnight, in my article In Defense of Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles.    

Finally, in my article Canada’s “Mr. Science” Labels Colloidal Silver Usage “Quackery” you can learn more about how the “skeptics,” “quackbusters” and so-called natural health “debunkers” conduct these coordinated media attacks…

…as well as how they use techniques such as “Google-bombing” to manipulate search engine results so that when someone searches, for example, for the term “colloidal silver,” only negative articles come up in the top rankings.

The Good News…

The good news is that people have been waking up for a l-o-o-o-n-g time now, and are beginning to pull off their blindfolds in droves. 

It’s simply not as easy as it used to be for the propagandists who shill for Big Pharma to pull the wool over the eyes of the awakening populace. People are catching on to the lengths Big Pharma will go to protect its multi-billion dollar annual drug profits.

Sharing articles like this one will help wake up even more people.  So please feel free to forward this article to your fellow natural health lovers, or email them the link to this article, so they too can read it.    

Big Pharma continues to work overtime to deceive the population into believing natural substances like colloidal silver are “unsafe and ineffective.”

But more and more people are waking up to the truth, thanks to the power of the internet.  Let’s help them do so by sharing the truth with others who may be interested.

Until next time, I remain…

Yours for the safe, sane and responsible use of colloidal silver,


Helpful Links:

                                                                                                                                                  
Important Note and Disclaimer:  The contents of this Ezine have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.  Information conveyed herein is from sources deemed to be accurate and reliable, but no guarantee can be made in regards to the accuracy and reliability thereof.  The author, Steve Barwick, is a natural health journalist with over 30 years of experience writing professionally about natural health topics.  He is not a doctor.  Therefore, nothing stated in this Ezine should be construed as prescriptive in nature, nor is any part of this Ezine meant to be considered a substitute for professional medical advice.  Nothing reported herein is intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.  The author is simply reporting in journalistic fashion what he has learned during the past 17 years of journalistic research into colloidal silver and its usage.  Therefore, the information and data presented should be considered for informational purposes only, and approached with caution.  Readers should verify for themselves, and to their own satisfaction, from other knowledgeable sources such as their doctor, the accuracy and reliability of all reports, ideas, conclusions, comments and opinions stated herein.  All important health care decisions should be made under the guidance and direction of a legitimate, knowledgeable and experienced health care professional.  Readers are solely responsible for their choices.  The author and publisher disclaim responsibility or liability for any loss or hardship that may be incurred as a result of the use or application of any information included in this Ezine.

Copyright 2012 | Life & Health Research Group, LLC | PO Box 1239 | Peoria AZ 85380-1239 | All rights reserved