Researchers from two
different medical universities in Taiwan have once again demonstrated that the
ionic form of silver, and not the metallic/nanosilver form, is what
kills pathogens.
Indeed, even when nanosilver
is used against pathogens, it’s the silver ions being shed from the
metallic silver particles that slaughter the microbes. The nanosilver itself has little to no
antimicrobial benefit.
In this latest study,
the researchers used cutting edge X-ray technology to examine dead pathogens
that had been treated with metallic nanosilver.
And they found the pathogens to be filled with silver ions and
not the metallic nanosilver they treated them with.
In other words, the metallic
nanosilver had to shed silver ions in the presence of the pathogens in order to
kill them. The nanosilver itself didn’t
even penetrate the bacterial shell. But
the silver ions that were shed by the metallic nanosilver did.
This, once more, puts
the lie to the oft-stated claim that the metallic form of silver kills
pathogens, while the ionic form is “inert.”
The truth is quite the opposite. Here’s
the story you won’t read anywhere else…
Hi, Steve Barwick here, for The Silver Edge…
I continue to see people posting articles on the internet
claiming that the metallic form of
colloidal silver is the only effective antimicrobial form, and that the ionic form of colloidal silver is not
effective at all against pathogens.
Of course, I’ve debunked that oft-repeated notion numerous
times over the past 20 years, and have demonstrated that the truth is quite the
opposite of these erroneous assertions.
I even published an entire web page replete with tons of clinical
documentation and quotes from bona-fide clinical research experts to
demonstrate just how false the notion is.
You can read that web page here: True Colloidal Silver Facts
Another New Study
Proves
Ionic Silver But Not Metallic Silver Kills Pathogens
Now, brand new research has confirmed the older research I’ve
previously reported on – and it’s done so in quite an unusual way.
In a clinical study
titled “The Antimicrobial Properties of Silver Nanoparticles in Bacillus subtilis are Mediated by
Released Ag+ Ions,” clinical researchers from two different medical
universities in Taiwan did something quite different from what’s been done in other
studies.
First, they exposed pathogens to metallic silver nanoparticles
-- i.e., very small submicroscopic particles of metallic silver -- and waited
until the pathogens died.
That’s where most researchers generally stop and conclude
that particles of metallic nanosilver kill pathogens.
But this intrepid group of researchers decided to take the
time to examine the silver inside of
the pathogens and determine what kind of silver it was.
Their hope was to determine whether the metallic nanosilver
itself was the antimicrobial agent, or whether the metallic nanosilver was merely
shedding silver ions in order to kill the pathogens.
What the researchers discovered was that there was no
metallic nanosilver whatsoever inside of the pathogens.
Indeed, the chemical “signature” of raw metallic silver – i.e.,
Ag0 – could not be found. Instead, the
silver that penetrated and killed the pathogens was composed of silver ions -- i.e., Ag+ -- which through the process of oxidation had been converted inside the
bacteria to Ag20 (silver oxide) after they died.
In other words, the researchers proved what I’ve said all
along: Metallic nanosilver is basically
inert. It cannot kill infectious
microbes except to the extent that it sheds silver ions in the presence of the
microbes, and the silver ions then penetrate the bacterial cell wall and kill
the microbe.
Here’s What the
Researchers Wrote
Here, in brief, is what the researchers wrote after
completing their study (I’ll explain their findings briefly, afterwards):
“There
is an ongoing debate over whether silver nanoparticles inherently possess
toxicity, or if microbial toxicity is dependent on leached Ag+ ions [i.e,
silver ions – ED] from nanoparticles.
To
clarify this issue, we utilized XANES/EXAFS analysis to assess the fine
structure of silver particles present within Bacillus subtilis cells treated
with 100 ppm of silver nanoparticles.
This
data strongly suggests that in aqueous solutions, silver nanoparticles leach
off positively charged silver ions, which subsequently enter bacterial cells
and are oxidized to form Ag2O [silver oxide – ED].
If
silver nanoparticles entered cells directly, it would have been possible to
detect spectra corresponding to the Ag standard.
…
this is the first study to directly analyze silver particles present within
bacterial cells treated with silver nanoparticles, and the results indicate
that positively charged silver ions are primarily responsible for silver
nanoparticle microbial toxicity.
…our
results support the theory that silver nanoparticles exert microbial toxicity
through the release of positively charged silver ions that subsequently
penetrate into bacterial cells.”
-- The Antimicrobial Properties of Silver Nanoparticles in Bacillus
subtilis are Mediated by Released Ag+ Ions, PLOS-One, December 15, 2015
This is quite fascinating, of course, because the so-called “true
colloidal silver” crowd is always claiming that silver ions become neutralized
in the body and therefore cannot kill pathogens, and that only metallic nanosilver
(aka silver nanoparticles) can penetrate the shell wall of the microbes and
kill them.
But this new study (along with many older studies I document
on the aforementioned True
Colloidal Silver Facts web page) demonstrates conclusively that metallic silver
nanoparticles don’t penetrate infectious
microbes and kill them, but silver ions being shed by the metallic silver nanoparticles do.
Proper Examination
Proves the Point
What makes this new study stand out head-and-shoulders above
the others is that the researchers actually took the time to examine the silver
inside of the dead microbes, and determine what actually killed them.
They used a special form of x-ray analysis called “XANES/EXAFS
analysis” to determine what kind of silver would be found inside the dead
microbes.
And what they found were silver ions that had penetrated the
bacterial shells, killed the bacteria, and then were oxidized, i.e., turning the
ionic silver into silver oxide similar to the gray coating you’ll find on the
positive silver rod of a colloidal silver generator after making a batch of
ionic colloidal silver.
Indeed, the researchers essentially concluded that the metallic
nanosilver serves as nothing more than a carrier or reservoir of silver ions. But it cannot kill the pathogen without
shedding those ions. The silver ions are
the real assassins. The metallic
nanosilver is merely the vehicle through which the silver ions are delivered to
the microbe.
All of which leads me to point out once again that the ionic
form of colloidal silver is superior to the metallic nanosilver form, because
it doesn’t have to be converted from metallic silver to ionic silver inside the
human body in order to be effective.
This demonstrates once more that the silver ion (i.e., ionic
silver) is the active, infection-fighting form of silver, and that metallic nanosilver
can only work against pathogens to the extent it sheds silver ions.
More importantly, it demonstrates that when researchers
claim they’ve proven in clinical studies that nanosilver kills pathogens, they’ve
never checked to see if the “specie” of silver inside the pathogens is the
metallic nanosilver they used in the study, or the silver ions being shed by
the nanosilver in the presence of the pathogens.
Instead, they simply assumed
it was the metallic nanosilver doing the killing. And of course, as the old saying goes, whenever
one “assumes” something, the end result often makes an “ass” out of “u” and “me.”
The Rice University
Study
In a previous clinical study which I reported on several
years ago, researchers from Rice University produced similar results:
Quoting directly from the Abstract of the Rice University
study, titled "Negligible Particle-Specific Antibacterial Activity of
Silver Nanoparticles", which was published in the July 5, 2012 issue of
the journal Nano Letters:
"For nearly a decade,
researchers have debated the mechanisms by which silver nanoparticles exert
toxicity to bacteria and other organisms. The most elusive question has been
whether the silver nanoparticles exert direct "particle-specific"
effects beyond the known antimicrobial activity of released silver ions (Ag+).
Here, we infer that silver
ions are the definitive molecular toxicant.
We rule out direct
particle-specific biological effects by showing the lack of toxicity of silver
nanoparticles when synthesized and tested under strictly anaerobic conditions
that preclude Ag(0) oxidation and Ag+ release.”
In other words, when the researchers took away the ability
of the metallic nanosilver to shed silver ions, the metal particles were no
longer toxic to bacteria. It is only
when metallic silver (i.e., nanosilver) is able to shed silver ions that it can
kill bacteria.
So the big question is this:
Why bother to use metallic nanosilver at all, when instead you can simply use the active
infection-fighting form of colloidal silver – ionic silver – and kill the pathogens faster and more
reliably?
Learn to Make Your
Own
Ionic Colloidal
Silver
Not only is ionic silver the active, infection-fighting form
of colloidal silver, it’s also extremely easy to make with the right
equipment. In fact, it’s so easy I know
85 year old grandmas who routinely make their own high-quality ionic colloidal
silver.
Of
course, ionic colloidal silver is sold in just about every health food store in
America. Indeed, it’s the #1 most popular form of colloidal silver on the
market, and that’s because it works so well against pathogens. But it’s awfully expensive to buy, averaging
about $20 to $30 for a tiny four-ounce bottle, which is about $5 to $7 per ounce.
Thankfully,
you can make your own high-quality ionic colloidal silver for about one penny per ounce, with a new
Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator from The Silver Edge.
What’s
more, colloidal silver is so simple to make at home, anyone
who can use a coffee pot has all the skill needed to make their own safe, natural
ionic colloidal silver. Let me demonstrate for you how amazingly
simple it is:
1.) Just plug the two pure
.999 fine silver rods into the two jacks in the bottom of the generator box,
one on each side of the bubbler tube.
3.) Set the handy appliance
timer for three hours, and plug it into any convenient grounded household
electrical outlet.
4.) Plug the generator into
the timer and then turn the timer wheel clockwise until you hear the generator
start bubbling. The generator will shut off automatically after three hours.
It’s
really that easy! You
just “Set it, and forget it.” And you get a perfect batch of high-quality
micro-particle colloidal silver every time!
When you’re finished, you’ll have a full quart of high-quality micro-particle colloidal silver. And you can make quart after quart for the rest of your life, for less than 36 cents each!
When you’re finished, you’ll have a full quart of high-quality micro-particle colloidal silver. And you can make quart after quart for the rest of your life, for less than 36 cents each!
Indeed,
the set of pure .999 fine silver rods that comes with your generator
is enough to make over $24,000 worth of colloidal silver (I’m not kidding you; see here)!
Why
should you ever again pay $20 to $30 for a tiny, four-ounce bottle of ionic colloidal
silver at the health food store, when you can make your own superior-quality
micro-particle ionic colloidal silver for just pennies per quart?
Almost
FREE, for the Rest of Your Life!
Obviously, having the ability to
make your own high-quality micro-particle ionic colloidal silver for only a
few pennies per quart is about as close as you’ll ever get to having
"free" colloidal silver for the rest of your life
And you’ll
have it available any time you or a family member, friend or loved one needs
it.
And because
the ionic silver particles produced by this amazing breakthrough in colloidal
silver-making technology are as low as .8 nm – a fraction of a single nanometer
– their effectiveness against colonies of pathogenic microbes is astonishing.
Perhaps
that’s why so many thousands upon thousands of people absolutely rave about the
effectiveness of their homemade micro-particle colloidal silver, as you can see
at this web page full of real-life colloidal
silver success stories.
Discover
How Easy It Is…
If
you’d like to learn more about making your own high-quality colloidal silver
for just pennies per quart, you can…
- Read how unbelievably simple it is to make your own high-quality colloidal silver for less than 36 cents a quart, here.
- Learn why the Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator is the world’s #1 best-selling colloidal silver generator, here.
- Find out how to save a whopping $100 on a brand new Micro-Particle Colloidal Silver Generator, here.
Meanwhile,
I’ll be back next week with another great article on colloidal silver….
Yours
for the safe, sane and responsible use of colloidal silver,
Steve
Barwick, author
The Ultimate Colloidal Silver Manual
The Ultimate Colloidal Silver Manual
Helpful Links:
Important Note
and Disclaimer: The
contents of this Ezine have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug
Administration. Information
conveyed herein is from sources deemed to be accurate and reliable, but no
guarantee can be made in regards to the accuracy and reliability thereof. The author, Steve Barwick, is a
natural health journalist with over 30 years of experience writing professionally
about natural health topics. He
is nota doctor. Therefore, nothing stated in this
Ezine should be construed as prescriptive in nature, nor is any part of this
Ezine meant to be considered a substitute for professional medical
advice. Nothing reported
herein is intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease. The author is simply reporting in
journalistic fashion what he has learned during the past 17 years of
journalistic research into colloidal silver and its usage. Therefore, the
information and data presented should be considered for informational purposes
only, and approached with caution. Readers
should verify for themselves, and to their own satisfaction, from other
knowledgeable sources such as their doctor, the accuracy and reliability of all
reports, ideas, conclusions, comments and opinions stated herein. All important health care decisions
should be made under the guidance and direction of a legitimate, knowledgeable
and experienced health care professional. Readers are solely responsible for
their choices. The author
and publisher disclaim responsibility and/or liability for any loss or hardship
that may be incurred as a result of the use or application of any information
included in this Ezine.
Copyright 2016 | Life & Health Research Group, LLC | PO Box
1239 | Peoria AZ 85380-1239 | All rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment